Skip to content

What is a Replay Attack? : Types, Prevention & Examples (2023)

In your place of work or your personal life, how many times do you connect with others? How many times have you sent an intensely confidential or private document?

It could be something as workwise serious as your business’s private bid for a tender or a document explaining your whole marketing policy for an upcoming quarter.

Now imagine if somebody that wasn’t supposed to see some of this gets access to it.

Consider that bad? Suppose that same somebody could change some information while it was being sent and ensure the intended destination received it.

In this circumstance, they could have altered the figures in the private official bid or changed the allocated budget for the advertising campaign.

This is what a replay attack seems like. The efficiency of such an attack depends on making both the sender & receiver think that the message was delivered perfectly while a huge change has been made.

By the time this change is noticed, the damage has possibly already been made.

So, if you’re concerned to learn more about what is replay attack, how it works, some examples, and most significantly, how to prevent replay attacks, then read on. 

What is a Replay Attack?

A replay attack is a type of man-in-the-middle attack in which a hacker or user sniffs info being sent on a channel to interrupt them & resend them under the cloak of genuine messages.

What makes the replay attack mainly damaging is that the attacker does not even need to decrypt the note they resend but can still fool the person who receives it into thinking that the message is genuine.

In other words, think of this illegal party as having the capability to snoop on all your conversations, communication, & digital activity taking place through that specific channel. A Wi-Fi network for instance.

There are many implications of such an attack since it can render closely all your communications online susceptible.

More extremely, it will carry on to linger as a constant phantom within your prospect security protocols as there is no way to recognize for how long your communications have cooperated.

How Does a Replay Attack Work?

Take a look at this real-life attack situation. By sending encrypted info to the firm’s financial administrator, a corporate worker requests a fund transfer.

This communication is interrupted by an attacker, who captures it and might now resend it.

The communication is already properly encrypted & seems valid to the financial administrator since it is a reliable message that has simply been resent.

In this circumstance, unless the fiscal administrator has cause to be suspicious, he or she is possibly to react to the new request. A vast quantity of money might be sent to the attacker’s bank account as a reprisal.

Replay attack vs. man-in-the-middle

There are various types of security threats that attackers can use to exploit uncertain applications. Threat actors can run several of these attacks using automatic software, while others need a more active role from attackers.

In this segment, we will clarify the basic knowledge behind a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack, offering examples and mitigation methods.

What Is a Man-in-the-Middle Attack?

A man-in-the-middle attack is a kind of eavesdropping attack, where attackers disturb an existing conversation or data transfer. After injecting themselves in the “mid” of the transfer, the attackers made-up to be both genuine participants.

This allows an attacker to interrupt information & data from either party while also sending harmful links or other information to both genuine participants in a method that might not be sensed till it is too late.

You can think of this kind of attack as similar to the game of telephone where one person’s words are carried along from member to member until it has changed by the time it reaches the last person.

In a man-in-the-middle attack, the middle contributor manipulates the conversation unidentified to either of the two genuine participants, acting to save confidential information & otherwise cause damage. Now we are going to tell you more about replay attacks.

Replay Attacks In Detail

Let us know replay attacks in detail with the benefit of a real-life example. Consider a business staff member asking for a monetary transaction from the company’s financial manager. He does so by sending an encoded message. 

An attacker seeking a loophole to launch a replay attack might snoop on this message to satisfy his intention. His following step would be capturing the message so that he can resend it.

Now the message will look completely authentic because it has already been sent once. The financial administrator, who gets the message, will find it authentic as it has already been encoded.

What will occur now? In this case, the chances are that the fiscal administrator will reply to this new message unless there is a strong reason to get distrustful.

He will not distinguish between the two statements— the one he gets from the company’s staff fellow & the other he received from the hacker. 

The receiver, in this circumstance, the fiscal administrator, has received a similar message. It could lead to the fiscal administrator sending a heavy amount to the bank account of the attacker.

So, what the hacker did was crack the message from the network & decrypt it. He doesn’t even need to read or decipher the message. He just resends the update as it is.

The attacker used a humble technique or hack to break into the system & replay it simply by resending a message. It is how a replay attack in network safety works. 

Examples of Replay Attacks

Suppose in the statement of two parties tom & bob; tom is sending his key to bob to verify his identity but in the meantime Attacker Jake overhears the conversation between them & keeps the data which are required to verify his identity to Bob. Later Jake contacts Bob and verifies its authenticity.

Except mitigated, networks and computers subject to replay attack would see the attack procedure as genuine messages.

One instance of a replay attack is to replay the note sent to a network by an attacker, which was formerly sent by a certified user.

Though the messages might be encrypted & the attacker might not get the real keys, and retransmission of valid data or logon posts could help them gain adequate access to the network.

A replay attack can get access to the assets by replaying a verification message and can complicate the destination host.

One of the finest techniques to prevent replay attacks is by using strong digital signatures with timestamps.

An additional technique that could be used to evade a replay attack is by making random session keys that are time-bound and procedure bound.

A one-time password for every request also helps in preventing replay attacks and is often used in banking operations.

Other methods used against replay attacks comprise sequencing of messages & non-acceptance of repeated messages.

How To Prevent Replay Attacks

We recognize that replay attacks can lead to dire penalties. So, the real query is, how can we protect ourselves from replay attacks?

The main way to stop replay attacks is to attach timestamps or order numbers to every sent message. This will let the receiver discard some messages with a repeated timestamp or order number.

An additional prevention technique is to utilize digital signatures to make it simpler for the receiver to validate if the sender is really the individual they think they are.

Replay attacks can also be minimalized with the help of random-session session keys, which are time-specific & will change with time making it hard for an attacker to fool the receiver with an earlier message.

As replay attacks are contingent on reusing the session authorizations that an attacker has intercepted, stopping replay attacks frequently means generating a single-use encryption key or ID for an Internet session.

Several network transmissions between two users now use a particular, single-use encryption key, which is simply valid for one session and will not let an attacker replay the session.

Users might even log into an account with a single-use passcode, which will have to be reset for every successive login. This stops a replay attacker from submitting one more request with the intercepted password; it will no longer be functional.

A virtual private network can protect users from man-in-the-middle attacks: they set up a computer network distinct from the normal network, which normally prevents attackers from stealing the Internet connection.

But, VPNs are not flawless, and they’ve sometimes allowed attackers to gain the user’s network through endpoint insecurities.

Certain VPNs really have flaws that let attackers replay Internet sessions, having gained access to their network link using cookies that weren’t dealt with correctly.

If you are using a VPN to evade replay attacks, research different options cautiously & watch for security bugs that have come to light in specific VPN products.

Standard Techniques in Replay Attacks

The predictable techniques in replay attacks are listed below.

Kerberos prevention technique: Throughout protocol exchanges between the user & the server, Kerberos implements a time authenticator. It also drafts the ticket’s lifetime and, most significantly, the user’s timestamp.

The message will be excluded if the authenticator’s timestamp isn’t within 5 minutes of the server’s time. This is because the extreme duration that might be accepted between users & servers is five minutes. But, the timing can be different.

One-time passwords (OTP): A password or secret code that can simply be used once for a transaction. With the user’s OTP program, the verification server operates on similar authorizations in OTP-based safety features.

The use of OTP is based on the indication that every OTP is valid for 10 minutes or one effective activation, depending on which comes first.

Sequencing: Authentic messages are numbered, & the receiver will reject accept packages, not in the right order. As a result, inner delay or duplication attacks are stopped.

Random session key: The session key allows both parties to have protected & closed-end transactions using time-bound & process-bound code.